How come you use death numbers as a bad thing?

The death figures are used as a bad thing because they emphasis exploitation industries measures, and because they demonstrate humans’ true perception of life and death, referring towards death as a bad thing but bring it about systematically and constantly. Another reason is that when we are trying to cover the world suffering elements we can’t ignore death which usually represents the end of lives full of suffering. The use of "death figures" fits our main idea, because the mentioned dead, died because their lives were so bad and because the suffering was so great, and suffering as you already understood is what we are all about.

As for humans' perception of life and death, most humans don't agree with us that death is not necessarily a bad thing.
They don’t agree that it depends on the suffering that has been increased or decreased following that death. Death itself is meaningless, it becomes meaningful only because it affects the surrounding creatures. Like any other action, death is a bad thing when it causes an increase of suffering and a good thing when it reduces suffering.
When a meat eater vivisectionist dies it will probably reduce suffering, so it is a good thing. When a vegan animal rights activist dies it will probably increase suffering - therefore a bad thing. In spite of this, humans still seize death as an absolute bad thing and therefore object the only one solution idea.

We assume that most humans (almost all of them) will vigorously oppose the idea, even though they are directly responsible for the murders of billions every year, for completely different reasons - not out of compassion, rational and moral concepts, not because it's the only way to stop the world suffering, but out of cupidity, ostentation, gluttony, dandyism, ignorance, cheap entertainment and fun.

Don’t you think it's ironic that humans who are responsible for the death of 950 animals during their lifetime proclaim to be pro life?! (950 animals is the world average of meat consumption per human, if you calculate eggs, milk, honey, clothes, electricity, your house which used to be animals’ inhabitant, oil, water, experiments which we all fund with our taxes, highways, plastic, logging, waste thrown into the oceans, nylon, diapers, candles, sugar, tobacco and of course pesticides which are in vegetarian food also and this is still a very partial list, then it would probably be a world average of 950 animals per day!).
Nothing is consistent, nothing is rational. Every human is a mass murder but when we suggest human extinction as a solution to most of the suffering in the world, every human is Hippocrates. Hypocrites actually.

Let’s take for example humans relation towards their own species. Half of the world's people are poor who drink dirty water, never wash their hands and have nothing to eat. And this is all human made. The fact that the three biggest problems humans face today are armed conflicts, water shortage and hunger is the severest testimonium paupertatis and the human race biggest failure. Humans kill each other on a daily basis for profit, parking space, because some humans pray 3 times a day and others 5 times a day.
They have robbed the entire world from other animals killing and hurting them, and now they constantly fight over land with each other. As a consequence of their occupation of the world they are able to produce much more food than the whole race needs. But yet one person out of 5 in developing countries is undernourished. This is the human race… don’t do anything right.
Our use of death figures in our website, demonstrates the irony in humans' objection to the only one solution.