In your website you write about human suffering, how can you compare human suffering to animals' suffering?

We don’t. We are trying to include every suffering element in the world with no difference in shape, size, color, gender, race or species.
Suffering is suffering, and all the suffering should be eliminated.

We hope and expect you to go over all our material and then you will find that out of our 44 articles, 8 regard humans as victims and all the rest regard nonhuman animals as victims. Only 7 slideshows out of 72 slideshows overall regard humans as victims and all the rest regard nonhuman animals. We feel that the reference to the different topics is proportional to the scope of the problem. At least that’s what we were aiming for.
And that too is only if you insist on a simplistic differentiation, as if the world debt or the state of women and children don’t significantly affect nonhumans not to mention the food and the water crisis.

Some of the human victim industries are vaster than some of the nonhuman animal industries. For example there are more girls and women who are victims of rape as a military strategy each year, than there are donkeys in the donkey basketball villainousness. We don’t argue that the donkeys’ lives are much worse and we don’t say otherwise, it just doesn’t matter. The same as it doesn’t matter whether chickens in battery cages suffer more than a sheep in the wool industry or vice versa.

When we were activists in the conventional movement it mattered because we wanted to help those who needed us the most, so we had to compare and decide somehow.
Now as we are aiming at stopping it all, it doesn’t matter.